Yes, you can make a catalog, and yes, you can put your complete library of images into the program. When it comes to maintaining a catalog of images, Luminar falls short of Lightroom. And I have to admit, Luminar does a really good job. These things can also be done in Lightroom and Photoshop, but it will take a lot more time and skill.

With a single slider it can enhance a landscape, or a sky. It can replace a sky in a quick and simple way, and it can enhance a portrait, by recognizing eyes, lips, and other facial features. This Artificial Intelligence is what Luminar is almost famous for. With just a few sliders it is possible to get a wonderful result. It is new, I gotta have it.With AI Portrait Enhancement, it is easy to post-process a portrait. Perhaps with time and modifications, it will be more what I expected? Then again, what did I expect, or did I just want to go with modern? Yes, fell into the trap, just like the people with lens acquisition syndrome. Luminar AI is not the great editing machine I had expected. PSS: Yes, I feel a bit cheated, I first bought Luminar 4, not realizing it was not the new Luminar AI.

PS: the AI that I do love and respect is Google Deep Dreams which reveals the AI brain gone insane in a nightmare. My older Topaz plugins do quite well, thank you! And who needs a doctor when we have AI? 'AI in Healthcare: The Hope, The Hype, The Promise, The Peril.' I have an excuse, I am old! I like to do my own editing and not leave it to an AI consensus. I have Luminar AI 1.2.0 and have no problems. Dogs are now AI, 'SpaceX Boston Dynamics robot dog named “Zeus' is by far more intelligent than your 'Fido' that slobbers and farts. The AI programs are the Robots of the future without the ridiculously designed bodies to look human. These programs can do no wrong and the problem is with us and our computers, not the program. Please, if the phrase AI or to some Ai is attached to a program we must not be irreverent and criticize.

Luminar ai forum